When reading all messages I see a word (VERT) or (VERT/PPALACE) next after the FROM: name. What is that mean? Why is it there? Sorry for asking so much stupid questions but everything is new to me. Thanks for your help.
That's the path back to the original BBS the message came from. If it's just "VERT", it was written on VERT, and your system got it from there. If it's "VERT/PPALACE", it was written on PPALACE, sent to VERT, then sent to your system.
Re: Question
By: Deuce to Peter on Wed Nov 11 2015 11:10 am
That's the path back to the original BBS the message came from. If it's just "VERT", it was written on VERT, and your system got it from there. If it's "VERT/PPALACE", it was written on PPALACE, sent to VERT, then sent to your system.
I see, then it is technical information.
I would like "not to see" that in the header of every message.
It is NOT necessary. The less crauwded the better. I like simple things.
How do I remove that information from every message?
I see. So, BOB from one network would be also BOB from other network. Big problem. I thought that each individual joining DOVE would have a unique email adreess, like peter@bbs.daprose.net would be different than peter@vert.syncho.net . By the way, I logged in at your bbs and created an
Re: Question
By: Digital Man to Peter on Wed Nov 11 2015 07:24 pm
I see. So, BOB from one network would be also BOB from other network.
Big
problem. I thought that each individual joining DOVE would have a unique email adreess, like peter@bbs.daprose.net would be different than peter@vert.syncho.net .
By the way, I logged in at your bbs and created an
account as Peter, and I started to receive all messages I received on mine.
Why did that happen?
Peter at my BBS should no be the same as Peter on your
BBS. It must be trated as two different persons. Please do not take it wrong. I did like to be recognized in your system, but that shouldn't happen anyway. Dpn't you think so?
it's possible you could be
notified of public messages received for a different Peter, but that doesn't mean you'd be able to read the private mail/messages destined for someone else.
Most BBS users either use a unique alias (like "digital man") or their
full real name (like "Rob Swindell"). If you want to be known as just
This SHOULD NOT happen, even in the echo areas. Then, something is not working right or should be fixed. It happened as you mention. I was receiving all messages I was not supposed to receive because I was a different Peter at a different BBS. This is something to pass it alone to
I see, so I have to change my nick an call myself Peter-TRu-lulu-lalala !
peter.bbs.daprose.net , don't you think that is unique enought??? I would
think we should put ouor users in that dilema. If I choos PeterPan, sooner or later there will be another PeterPan and we both will be reading the same echo mail and responding what we do not suppose to respond.
sameMost BBS users either use a unique alias (like "digital man") or their full real name (like "Rob Swindell"). If you want to be known as just
I see, so I have to change my nick an call myself Peter-TRu-lulu-lalala !
hehehehe, I would prefer just be the only one and unique peter.bbs.daprose.net , don't you think that is unique enought??? I would preffer not to have any restrictions as to what name I want to use. Nor I think we should put ouor users in that dilema. If I choos PeterPan, sooner or later there will be another PeterPan and we both will be reading the
echo mail and responding what we do not suppose to respond.
Re: Question
By: Digital Man to Peter on Fri Nov 13 2015 12:44 am
it's possible you could be
notified of public messages received for a different Peter, but that doesn't mean you'd be able to read the private mail/messages destined for someone else.
This SHOULD NOT happen, even in the echo areas. Then, something is not working right or should be fixed. It happened as you mention. I was receiving all messages I was not supposed to receive because I was a different Peter at a different BBS. This is something to pass it alone to the programmer so he/she can improve that part. It should not happen.
Most BBS users either use a unique alias (like "digital man") or their full real name (like "Rob Swindell"). If you want to be known as just
I see, so I have to change my nick an call myself Peter-TRu-lulu-lalala !
hehehehe, I would prefer just be the only one and unique peter.bbs.daprose.net , don't you think that is unique enought???
I would
preffer not to have any restrictions as to what name I want to use.
Nor I
think we should put ouor users in that dilema. If I choos PeterPan, sooner or later there will be another PeterPan and we both will be reading the same echo mail and responding what we do not suppose to respond.
Yes, sure, but it's rather long and doesn't roll of the tongue very well.
Is this your first time using a BBS message network?
peter@vert.syncho.net . By the way, I logged in at your bbs and created an account as Peter, and I started to receive all messages I received on mine.
Why did that happen? Peter at my BBS should no be the same as Peter on
your BBS. It must be trated as two different persons. Please do not take
By the way, I logged in at your bbs and created anProbably because by "messages" you mean public posts. Everyone can see the public replies to your messages, not just you and not just on your BBS.
account as Peter, and I started to receive all messages I received on mine.
Why did that happen?
you should always create a unique name. you are not the only peter on the planet earth. you will be receiving emails and junk from all the previous morons who used the name peter on the bbs.
Well, being serious about it. The system should be smart enough to
recognice one peter from another, instead of having to use an alternate unique name that is not unique at all as I can also choose Mro for as my nick name, but Synchronet should recognice Mro from bbs.daprose.net and Mro from your BBS. That was my point.
Sysop: | MCMLXXIX |
---|---|
Location: | Prospect, CT |
Users: | 326 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 141:57:52 |
Calls: | 513 |
Messages: | 222344 |